Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Active Spine Physical Therapy, LLC v. Becerra
as 8:2026cv00227
Plaintiff:
Active Spine Physical Therapy, LLC
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Kunz v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2026cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunz
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mason v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2026cv00168
Plaintiff:
Trenton Mason
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crismor v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Susan Crismor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Marshall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11431
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Robert E Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02048
Plaintiff:
Tina Louise Franklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Fortino Martinez Espinosa v. US Social Security Department
as 2:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Fortino Martinez Espinosa
Defendant:
US Social Security Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SOTO GARCIA v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv04695
Plaintiff:
JOSE M SOTO GARCIA
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r o KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SOTO GARCIA v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2022cv04695
Plaintiff:
JOSE M SOTO GARCIA
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WICKER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv05655
Plaintiff:
TAMMY WICKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
