Cases 91 - 100 of 121
Bellmore v. Macomb,County of et al
as 2:2009cv11622
Plaintiff:
John Bellmore
Defendant:
Macomb, County of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gilbert v. Mackey et al
as 2:2009cv10773
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Gilbert
Defendant:
Rose Mackey, Pamela Ann Talbot, Stacy Swanderski and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shannon v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv10420
Plaintiff:
Darren Shannon
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Raymond Booker, Kenneth Romanowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erdman v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv10136
Plaintiff:
Dennis Guy Erdman
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Crawford v. Brown et al
as 2:2008cv14586
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Crawford
Defendant:
Brown, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Cottie and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Fox v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv14410
Plaintiff:
Cherunda Fox
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gopaul Singl and Rummella
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv14229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lyons v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv13631
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lyons
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Stewart and Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cranford v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv12698
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cranford, III
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Rashida McMillan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
