Cases 141 - 150 of 14,234
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv12088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv12083
Defendant:
William Zeolla, Amanda Doorlag, Robert Mackey and others
Plaintiff:
Amad Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Oliver v. Oakland County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv11525
Defendant:
Oakland County Sheriff's Office and John Dean
Plaintiff:
Stanley Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12053
Defendant:
Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. and Universal Protection Service, LLC
Plaintiff:
Venice Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Patterson v. Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv12054
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LLC and Ralph Lauren Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Venice Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv12056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
