Cases 41 - 50 of 680
Martinez, Sr. et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11350
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr., Ana Martinez DeJesus, Yaritza Martinez DeJesus and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Dr. Carl Schmidt, Dr. Leigh Hlavaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorris v. William Beaumont Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv11272
Plaintiff:
Taveya Dorris
Defendant:
William Beaumont Hospital and Corewell Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goff, et al v Monroe, et al
as 2:2023cv10900
Plaintiff:
travis goff and Misty Goff
Defendant:
David Monroe, Ann Arbor, City of, John Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hines et al v. Michigan High School Athletic Association et al
as 4:2023cv10381
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hines, Mark Savoury and Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Michigan High School Athletic Association and Vic Michaels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10321
Plaintiff:
Daquan P James
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Brittany Moss, Markala Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Wood et al
as 2:2023cv10229
Plaintiff:
Lance Crawford
Defendant:
William Wood, Unknown Officers, Farmington, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hull v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv10067
Plaintiff:
Austin Hull
Defendant:
Spencer Coleman, Ken Miller and William Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
