Cases 31 - 40 of 235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv13135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LaForge et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv12778
Plaintiff:
Kimberly LaForge and Yassine Marouani
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12493
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12374
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hicks-Fields v. Corrigan
as 2:2022cv12274
Petitioner:
Christopher Hicks-Fields
Respondent:
James Corrigan
Fields v. Hemingway
as 4:2022cv11710
Petitioner:
Da'Ione L Fields
Respondent:
Warden and Jonathan Hemingway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tebedo v. Dice Automotive Group LLC et al
as 2:2022cv11071
Defendant:
Laurie K. Cunningham, Dice Automotive Group LLC, Non Stop Auto Sales LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Tebedo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
