Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Pierce v. Guardian & Associates et al
as 2:2018cv11716
Plaintiff:
Cinnamon Pierce
Defendant:
Guardian & Associates, David Broxton, Lawrence Paolucci and others
Sears et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11298
Plaintiff:
Michael Sears , Richard Serrels , Paulette Shaw and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Great Lakes Fleet, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10819
Plaintiff:
James A. Ham
Defendant:
Great Lakes Fleet, Inc., Key Lakes, Inc. and Key Stone Shipping Co.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Cooper et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10486
Plaintiff:
Oleka Cooper , K. C. , Stacie Clark and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder, City of Flint, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kress et al v. Stone Well Service, LLC
as 2:2017cv13795
Plaintiff:
Adam Kress and Sojna Kress
Defendant:
Stone Well Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Sholtz et al
as 2:2017cv12675
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Robinson
Defendant:
Ray Sholtz, Laura McCormick, John Doe and others
Cosgrove v. Willson et al
as 2:2017cv11986
Plaintiff:
Cary Cosgrove
Defendant:
Tamie Willson, Jeffrey Dame and David Stone
OYK ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION et al v. ROMAR STONE CARVING, INC.
as 2:2016cv14275
Plaintiff:
OYK ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, assumed name of OYK INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Michigan Limited Liability Company , Fayiz Hadid and Amal Hadid
Defendant:
ROMAR STONE CARVING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michigan Democratic Party v. Michigan Republican Party et al
as 2:2016cv13924
Plaintiff:
Michigan Democratic Party
Defendant:
Michigan Republican Party , Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. , Roger J. Stone, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Stone v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv13679
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Frank Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
