Cases 41 - 50 of 3,170
Detroit Renaissance Fund LLC v. Crigler et al
as 2:2024cv10377
Plaintiff:
Detroit Renaissance Fund LLC
Defendant:
Edris Crigler and Damond C. Williams
Myers v. R.G.P., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10354
Plaintiff:
Amy Myers
Defendant:
R.G.P., Inc. Doing business as Quality Team 1 and Bradley J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner
as 2:2024cv10308
Plaintiff:
Katrina Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Giles v. Federspiel, et al
as 2:2024cv10134
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Giles
Defendant:
William L. Federspiel, Rasco and Tiggs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yang v. One Lily Pad, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv13248
Plaintiff:
Chuanhua Yang
Defendant:
One Lily Pad, LLC and William Martines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
