Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13186
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10064
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Evans v. USA
as 2:2016cv14145
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Ernie Thomas Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. U.S. Bank National Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv14013
Plaintiff: Ernie Johnson
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HICKE et al v. HAYES et al
as 2:2011cv13192
Plaintiff: ERNIE HICKE , SHANE HICKE and BARBARA HICKE
Defendant: MARIBETH HAYES and Hat Trick Hockey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKE et al v. HAYES et al
as 2:2011cv13190
Plaintiff: ERNIE HICKE, SHANE HICKE and BARBARA HICKE
Defendant: MARIBETH HAYES and Hat Trick Hockey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv12103
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HICKE et al v. HAYES et al
as 2:2011cv10838
Defendant: MARIBETH HAYES and Hat Trick Hockey, Inc.
Plaintiff: ERNIE HICKE and SHANE HICKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kettlewell v. Social Security, Commissioner of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv13919
Plaintiff: Ernie R Kettlewell and Ernie R Kettlewell
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ashford v. Detroit Transportation Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv11273
Plaintiff: Emmett Quincy Ashford
Defendant: Detroit Transportation Corporation, Detroit People Mover, Ernie Latham and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?