Cases 151 - 160 of 3,638
Pickett #485575 v. Rewerts
as 1:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Pickett #485575, Jr.
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark #957553 v. King
as 1:2022cv01058
Petitioner:
Warren Clark #957553
Respondent:
Christopher King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson #753595 v. Nagy
as 1:2022cv00936
Petitioner:
Darren Deon Johnson #753595
Respondent:
Noah Nagy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cassaday v. Mendham
as 1:2022cv00951
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Respondent:
Maarten Vermaat and Bob Mendham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parks #749266 v. Burgess
as 1:2022cv00823
Petitioner:
Marquisse Davon Parks #749266
Respondent:
Michael Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin #741189 v. Taskila
as 2:2022cv00199
Petitioner:
DeAndre Austin #741189
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flowers #244656 v. Morrison
as 1:2022cv00981
Petitioner:
Vashon Flowers #244656
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #766797 v. Walczak
as 1:2022cv00900
Petitioner:
Alonte Smith #766797
Respondent:
Mike Walczak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas #254903 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00834
Petitioner:
Ronnie Dante Thomas #254903
Respondent:
James R. Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Simmons v. Straub
as 1:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Simmons
Respondent:
Dennis Straub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
