Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Fetterolf #478806 v. Bell
as 1:2007cv00792
Petitioner: Jeffrey Alan Fetterolf #478806
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers #156853 v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00783
Petitioner: Morris Paul Rogers #156853
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crossley #233859 v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00518
Petitioner: Vincent Edward Crossley #233859
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manes #371662 v. Bell
as 1:2007cv00453
Petitioner: Daniel Edward Manes #371662
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haytham #188486 v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00436
Petitioner: Ammar Abdullah Haytham #188486
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Herndon #491050 v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00285
Petitioner: Edmund Herndon #491050
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall #204275 v. Bell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00239
Petitioner: Nolan Hall #204275
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: O
Anderson #496683 v. Bell
as 1:2007cv00176
Petitioner: John Alvin-Edward Anderson #496683, Jr.
Respondent: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp #195644 v. Bell
as 1:2007cv00045
Plaintiff: Archie Sharp #195644, Jr.
Defendant: Thomas K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?