Cases 11 - 20 of 1,799
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane, as Personal Representative and Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Kane v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Sara Kane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Michael v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
Terry Bernard Michael
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mercado-Lozano v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mercado-Lozano and Heriberto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Newman v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Casey Richard Newman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jager v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Benjamin John Jager, II
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Debra Shore, Marta Fuoco and others
United States of America v. Postma
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keeler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Kyle Stone Keeler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Postma
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy L. Postma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
