Cases 191 - 200 of 5,597
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rawlins v. Leaffilter North, LLC
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Vickie Rawlins
Defendant:
Leaffilter North LLC d/b/a Leaffilter
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Koeller v. Picnic Corporation
as 4:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Koeller
Defendant:
Picnic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McCreary v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 4:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Joshua McCreary
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wamhoff v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 4:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
William Wamhoff
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dental Recycling North America, Inc. v. Stoma Ventures, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Dental Recycling North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Stoma Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Human v. Benepath, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Benepath, Inc., Compare Health Quotes, Clelland Green and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Margulis v. American Global Obligors, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Margulis
Defendant:
American Global Obligors, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
