General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,047
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Respondent: Bill Stange
Petitioner: Jihad Ahmad Spann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otte v. Morriss We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00712
Respondent: Kelly Morriss
Petitioner: Shawn Otte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Respondent: Bill Stange
Petitioner: Sokol Zuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Respondent: Ryan Woods
Petitioner: Darryl R. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. USA
as 4:2024cv00638
Petitioner: Timothy Cross
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paul v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00623
Petitioner: Rico Paul
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner: Antonio Courtney
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Huhn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00630
Petitioner: William Billy G. Carter
Respondent: Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00613
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valley v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00608
Petitioner: Robert Valley
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?