Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Newton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Newton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Whalen v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
John P Whalen, IV
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Newton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grable v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00459
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
John Grable
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Walker v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Walker
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grable v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01177
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
John Grable
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Andrews v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00972
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
John Andrews
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Redd v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00880
Plaintiff:
John Redd
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Merrill v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00836
Plaintiff:
John E Merrill
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Polston v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00663
Plaintiff:
John W. Polston
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
