Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Parker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parker v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Keith T. Parker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sager v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kalonda T Sager
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Copeland v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00816
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Copeland
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sayers v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Sayers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Copeland v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Copeland
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gibson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01375
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Gibson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Xenos v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Antonios T Xenos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Teonie T. Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lindell v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01431
Plaintiff:
Edwin T Lindell, III and Edwin T. Lindell, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
