Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United Food and Commerical Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan et al v. Topaz Retail, LLC
as 4:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commerical Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan, David Cook, Robert Spence and others
Defendant:
Topaz Retail, LLC d/b/a IGA, Elsberry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roberts et al v. Arrow Senior Living Management, LLC
as 4:2021cv01370
Plaintiff:
Deborah Roberts and Jadan Cook
Defendant:
Arrow Senior Living Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan et al v. Elias & Sons, LLC
as 4:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan, Larry Hunt, Mark G Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Elias & Sons, LLC doing business as Elsberry IGA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cook v. SAF-Holland, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02140
Defendant:
SAF-Holland, Inc., Ms. Mary Brown and Mary C. Brown
Plaintiff:
Tony Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cook v. J.B. Restaurant Investments, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02513
Plaintiff:
Brandi Cook
Defendant:
J.B. Restaurant Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan et al v. Highland Diversified, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02203
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan , David Cook , Gary Torpea and others
Defendant:
Highland Diversified, Inc., R.R. Queen Properties, LLC,, R.E.G. Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Cook v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2013cv01484
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and SSM Health Care St. Louis
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
