Cases 41 - 50 of 60
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission v. Uber, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01562
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Defendant:
Uber, Inc. , Uber Technologies, Inc. , John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roe v. Arch Coal Inc et al
as 4:2015cv00910
Plaintiff:
Douglas R Roe
Defendant:
Arch Coal Inc, The Finance Committee of the Board of Directors of Arch Coal Inc, Theodore D Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kelley v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Machelle Kelley
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Chris Koster, Angela Mesmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
AMANDA E. KELLEY
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. , ORGANON INTERNATIONAL,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelley v. SRA Associates, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Kristy L. Kelley
Defendant:
SRA Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kelley v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Diane Kelley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Zorn v. Middleton et al
as 4:2011cv02101
Plaintiff:
Carl Zorn
Defendant:
Fred A. Middleton, Christopher Alafi, David W. Benfer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edington v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kelley A. Edington
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Department of Labor v. Craftsman Independent Union et al
as 1:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Department of Labor
Defendant:
Craftsman Independent Union, Craftsman International Union, Fred Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Simmons et al v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
Kandice Simmons, Tamika Kilgore, Meia Burks and others
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and EAN Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
