Cases 61 - 70 of 51,041
Walker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shanreckia Lanell Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jill Burch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Didovic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Semsa Didovic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Smith v. Bush et al
as 4:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Leonard Smith
Defendant:
Eldrick Bush and Brink's, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pace v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. TMX Finance, LLC
as 4:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
TMX Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pace v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 4:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pace
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
