Cases 81 - 90 of 210
Dizes v Mandarich Law Group, LLP
as 4:2015cv01898
Plaintiff:
Amber Dizes
Defendant:
Mandarich Law Groups, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Law et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv01839
Plaintiff:
Harley Law and Sheena Hubbard
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Vogler Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 4:2015cv01654
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Morgan
Defendant:
Vincent D. Vogler , Vincent V. Vogler , Vogler Law Firm, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01582
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Jenkins et al v. Burkey et al
as 4:2015cv01494
Plaintiff:
Scott Jenkins and Rhonda Alexandropoulos
Defendant:
Bruce Burkey, Taylor Law Firm, P.C., Joice Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Wade v. Account Resolution Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv01354
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade
Defendant:
Account Resolution Corporation , Dennis J. Barton, III and The Barton Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kohn et al v. Komen et al
as 4:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Kohn , Catherine K. Kohn and Jilila III Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Leonard Komen , Law Offices of Leonard Komen, PC and Gaol Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Henry v. J&M Securities, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01078
Plaintiff:
Ronald Henry
Defendant:
J&M Securities, LLC and Sansone Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. J & M Securities, LLC
as 4:2015cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Davis
Defendant:
J & M Securities, LLC and Sansone Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
