Cases 1 - 10 of 1,656
Estes v. Missouri Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Estes
Defendant:
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eric S. Schmitt, Karen L. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cranmer v. Securus-J-Pay et al
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Cranmer
Defendant:
Securus-J-Pay, Potosi Correctional Center and Ms. Unknown Sansegraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutherlin v. AT&T Inc.
as 4:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Sutherlin
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Brown
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Farmers Insurance Co., Inc.
as 4:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
David Shelton and David T. Shelton
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. and Farmers Insurance Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ware v. Department of Justice Services et al
as 4:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Department of Justice Services and Officer Unknown Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Corrections of Medicine
as 4:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Corrections of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
