Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Capelton Jr. v. Sam's East Inc.
as 4:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Michael Capelton Jr.
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc. doing business as Sam's Club #4741
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Howard et al v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2021cv01111
Plaintiff:
Victoria Howard and Harold Howard
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and Michael T. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stagner et al v. 4e Brands Northamerica, L.L.C. et al.
as 4:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
M.S. and Debra Stagner
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc. doing business as Sam's Club #6474, 4E Brands Northamerica, LLC and 4e Brands Northamerica, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrmann v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00706
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc., d/b/a Sam's Club #6474 and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club # 6474
Plaintiff:
Virginia Herrmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drummond-Foster v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2018cv01050
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lois Drummond-Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herman v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00495
Plaintiff:
Kathleen V Herman
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maurer et al v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Christoper Maurer and Belinda Maurer
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hopson v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Linda Hopson and Bruce Hopson
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. Sam's East, Incorporated d/b/a Sam's Club
as 4:2009cv00896
Defendant:
Sam's East, Incorporated d/b/a Sam's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Leahy v. Stearns et al
as 4:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Colleen Leahy
Defendant:
Stearns, Inc., K2, Inc., Jarden Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
