Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McBride v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Richard McBride
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kesler et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Gary Kesler, Rebecca Kesler, Eric Kesler and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kesler et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gary Kesler, Rebecca Sue Kesler, Eric Kesler and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Chicken, Inc., Tyson Sales & Distribution, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., IBP Revelopment Corp., IBP Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Daniels v. Keeling et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Julie Daniels
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and Robert C. Keeling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winslett v. Wallac
as 4:2010cv01862
Plaintiff:
Carnez Winslett
Defendant:
Pamela Wallac and Tyson Foods Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spence v. Supervalu, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01847
Plaintiff:
Linda S Spence
Defendant:
Supervalu, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
