Cases 21 - 30 of 1,986
USA v. Lugo
as 6:2023cv03391
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nestor Lugo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Edwards
as 6:2023cv03388
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Samuel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Walters
as 6:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Quenell Walters
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
The Brentwood Condominium Association v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Defendant:
Acacia Gentry, United States of America, Trustee of the Ray Sandy Sutton Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
The Brentwood Condominium Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
USA v. Ballard
as 6:2023cv03362
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Michael Ballard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Bordeaux
as 6:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Narvin Bordeaux
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Nelson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 6:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Betsy Nelson
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and Cenlar Agency, Inc. doing business as Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Barrows
as 6:2023cv03329
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gabriel Barrows
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Union Electric Company v. Brulez et al
as 2:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, a Missouri corporation
Defendant:
Brenan Brulez and Margaret Brulez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
