Cases 11 - 20 of 10,455
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 4:2024cv00378
Petitioner:
David James Milcendeau
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Advance Correctional Health et al
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
David E Dunham
Defendant:
Advance Correctional Health, Ashley Williams Weis, Robert Busetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prewitt v. Department of Mental Health
as 2:2024cv04087
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Prewitt
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Frederick Martin
Defendant:
Robert P. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haral v. Greene County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Haral
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Dr McGreevy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hecker v. Brewer
as 5:2024cv06065
Petitioner:
Aaron Hecker
Respondent:
Chris Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
