Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv01244
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DeBarthe et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 4:2012cv01128
Plaintiff:
Joseph DeBarthe and Maria DeBarthe
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and Millsap & Singer, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adair et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 4:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Twila Adair , Kimberly Adams , Amy Adamson and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. , JPMorgan Asset Management Holdings, Inc. , J.P. Morgan Invest Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Danforth et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 4:2012cv00763
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA , Safeguard Properties, Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Leon Danforth , Elizabeth Danforth , Allan Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rude v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 4:2012cv00681
Plaintiff:
Angela Christine Rude
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Beaver et al v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association et al
as 4:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jack L. Beaver, Hilda M. Beaver, Douglas A. Krones and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Ace Securities Corporate Home Trust 199 A Assets Backed Note, Sovereign Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor and others
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
