Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Perkins v. KCMO Police Dept. et al
as 4:2011cv01313
Plaintiff:
Reginald A Perkins
Defendant:
KCMO Police Dept., Missouri State Board of Probation and Parole, K. Robin Sipe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv01282
Petitioner:
James Tyrone Smith
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, US Probation Office of Western District of Missouri and Kansas City Community Center/Residential Re-Entry Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Porter et al
as 4:2011cv01141
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Harris
Defendant:
Marjore Porter, Nicole Mudd, David Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIlvoy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04298
Plaintiff:
Terry L. McIlvoy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04222
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cornelius v. Koster et al
as 4:2011cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wayne Cornelius
Respondent:
Chris Koster, Missouri Department of Corrections, George Lombardi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04147
Plaintiff:
Frank Hart
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and George Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04128
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole and WRDCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Dormire et al
as 4:2011cv00230
Petitioner:
Marvin Liddell Lott
Respondent:
Dave Dormire , George Lombardi and Missouri Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
