Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Combes v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC
as 4:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
Darrell M. Combes
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino Kansas City, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00389
Plaintiff:
Brenita Combs and Brenita Lanay Combs
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Combs v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00830
Plaintiff:
Mary J Combs and Mary Juanita Combs
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Combs Family Ventures LLC v. Branson View Zip Line LLC
as 6:2017cv03006
Plaintiff:
Combs Family Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Branson View Zip Line LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Combs v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00657
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp. v. Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00871
Plaintiff:
Capitol Specialty Insurance Corp.
Defendant:
Entertainment Concepts Investors, LLC, Lounge KC, LLC, d/b/a Mosaic Lounge, Dante' A.R. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PR Group, LLC et al v. Windmill International, Ltd. et al
as 4:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
PR Group, LLC , TLBR Group, LLC , Jerry J. Rellihan and others
Defendant:
Windmill International, Ltd. , Douglas S. Combs and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PR Group, LLC v. Windmill International, Ltd. et al
as 4:2014cv00401
Plaintiff:
PR Group, LLC
Defendant:
Windmill International, Ltd. and Douglas Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
