Cases 161 - 170 of 3,760
Garroutte v. USA
as 3:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Corey Garroutte
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. McClure
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Paul Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent Marcus McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryman v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrage v. Mississippi State Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jamey Paul Burrage
Defendant:
Mississippi State Prison, Marc McClure, Renita Hands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper, Jr. v. Circuit Court of Washington County
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Elton Harper, Jr.
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Washington County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McConnell v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
CleDarreyell L. McConnell
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Ms. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fain v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Fain
Defendant:
Green, Logan and Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Spencer et al
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Barry Spencer, James Glisson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
