Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Pye v. Desoto County et al
as 2:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pye
Defendant:
Desoto County, Bill Rascoe, Owensby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Chiles et al
as 4:2010cv00001
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Womack
Respondent:
Joyce Chiles and K. Elizabeth Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewer v. Thompson
as 2:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Brewer
Defendant:
Dale K. Thompson, Robert P. Chamberlin, Susan M. Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Clifton et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
George K. Hill
Defendant:
Inez Clifton, Curtis Reed, Lt. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hood et al
as 1:2009cv00108
Petitioner:
Terry Louis Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Andrew K. Hood and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Hood et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Hood and Judy K. Butler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowler v. Kelly et al
as 1:2007cv00308
Petitioner:
Robert K. Fowler
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muscolino v. Landrum et al
as 4:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michelangelo Muscolino
Defendant:
Michael Landrum, Sherry Maggitt, Anne Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates, et al v. Cook, et al
as 4:1971cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nazareth (nmi) Gates , Willie Lee Holms , Hal Zachary and others
Defendant:
Thomas D. Cook , J. D. Demoville , Turner Arant and others
Movant:
Melvin Griffin, Otis Fairley, Willie X. Stevenson and others
Respondent:
Willie E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
