Cases 71 - 80 of 3,760
Shephard v. Cox et al
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Adam Shephard
Defendant:
Warden Brenda Cox, Captain Carter and Captain Lathem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Jamaal Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gardner v. Monroe County Circuit Court
as 1:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Kentrell Gardner
Respondent:
Monroe County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Seth Thomas Copes
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheater v. Gallaird et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Billy Wheater
Defendant:
Karl Gallaird, Brandon Wilbanks, Sherry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Fitch et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
David Sanders
Respondent:
Lynn Fitch and Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdette v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette and Scooter
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mr. McDonald, Ms. Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Westmoreland v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Sherry Westmoreland
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. McClure
as 4:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *DO NOT FILE*
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jushaway v. MDOC
as 3:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
Joe Louis Jushaway
Defendant:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
