Cases 71 - 80 of 3,760
Pinson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Dartonio Pinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Thomas Taylor *DO NOT FILE*
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jushaway v. MDOC
as 3:2023cv00277
Petitioner:
Joe Louis Jushaway
Defendant:
MDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Westmoreland v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Sherry Westmoreland
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Jamaal Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Burdette v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette and Scooter
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mr. McDonald, Ms. Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Meeks et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Raphael Flowers
Defendant:
Laquita Meeks, Nurse Stewart, K9 Officer Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. White et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Carl Holder
Defendant:
Dakota White and Major S. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Monroe County Circuit Court
as 1:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
Kentrell Gardner
Respondent:
Monroe County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. McClure
as 4:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding *DO NOT FILE*
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
