Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cunningham v. Hughes
as 1:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Matthew Cunningham
Respondent:
Langford Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Hughes
as 4:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dean Boyd
Defendant:
Misty Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Sutton et al
as 4:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Lieutenant Silvia Sutton, Allison Unknown, Veroncia Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hughes v. Shults
as 3:2016cv00265
Petitioner:
Kerrick Deshaun Hughes
Respondent:
L. Shults
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCaley v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cordellra McCaley
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00057
Petitioner:
Hugh Roger Dale Green
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Dees et al
as 3:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Hugh Roger Green
Defendant:
James E. Dees and Andrew K. Howorth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
Carroll-Montgomery Regional Correctional Facility, A. L. Smith, O. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Epps et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Petitioner:
Yasmin Hughes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
