Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Hawkins v. State of Miss.
as 1:2024cv00075
Petitioner:
George Verlon Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. L.C.A.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dr. Reginald D. Bradley
Defendant:
L.C.A.D.C., Mr. Sheriff Eddie Hawkins, C.O. Mr. Lennox Bartlet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins, Jr. v. Rice
as 3:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Aron Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
State Ward Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Core Civic Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert White
Defendant:
Core Civic Corporation, Raphael Vergara, (Unknown) Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Cruse Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andrew c. Cruse Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Cheif Medical Director Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hawkins v. Rice et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Petitioner:
Aron Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden Rice and Attorney Hale J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv00081
Petitioner:
Glenn Wane Hawkins
Respondent:
Hubert Davis and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Winchester
as 4:2013cv00242
Petitioner:
David Hawkins
Respondent:
Sam Winchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2013cv00099
Petitioner:
Daryl Hawkins
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Alcorn County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jason Rickey Holloway
Defendant:
Pat Doe, Hudson, Allstat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
