Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McCray v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Otis Oliver McCray
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Paxton Paige, H. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Mills et al
as 4:2016cv00081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Mills, James Jones, Judy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00049
Petitioner:
Daniel Nathan Wood
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Gerald Chatham, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
DeSoto County Sheriff's Department, Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Wood et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Morrow
Defendant:
April Wood, Trent Kelly and Joe Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00175
Petitioner:
Authur Woods
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGinnis v. Pugh et al
as 1:2014cv00207
Plaintiff:
Cedrick McGinnis
Defendant:
Jason Pugh, Neal Higgason, Theresa Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Lowndes County et al
as 1:2013cv00178
Petitioner:
Rita Wood
Respondent:
Lowndes County and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hubbard v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 4:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Hubbard
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Delta Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonson v. Dale et al
as 3:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Josh Dale, Leon Williams, Lou A. HIcks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
