Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Jamison v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00172
Petitioner:
Micheal Jamison
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Celeste Wilson and Mark Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00152
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00153
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Matthews v. Holmes Tours & Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mesheal Matthews , Shanika Jamison , Aubrey Mosley and others
Defendant:
Holmes Tours & Transportation Services, Inc. and Adam Holmes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Delta Health Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. and Thomas F. Jamison
Defendant:
Delta Health Group, Inc., Skyler, Inc. and Scott J. Bell
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. and Thomas F. Jamison
Defendant:
Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. and Proclaim, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Jamison v. M.D.O.C. State of Mississippi
as 2:2009cv00219
Petitioner:
Andrew L. Jamison
Respondent:
M.D.O.C. State of Mississippi and Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
