Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Pelot v. Criterion 3, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Justin Bradley Pelot
Defendant:
Criterion 3, LLC and Gary Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conner v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tabarris D Conner
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Barry Standford, Richard T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fielder v. Connell et al
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Lori Fielder
Defendant:
J & B Services, Inc. , Toyota Boshoku Mississippi, LLC, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foreman v. Conner et al
as 1:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Patricia Foreman
Defendant:
Kyle Conner , General Casualty Co. of WI and J. Touhy's Sporting Goods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
General Casualty Co. of WI v. Conner et al
as 1:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
General Casualty Co. of WI
Defendant:
Kyle Conner, J. Touhy Sporting Goods, Inc. and Patricia Foreman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Richardson v. Conner et al
as 3:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Artez L. Richardson
Defendant:
Margaret Conner, Jerry Edwards, Jr., Tony Lee Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2012cv00092
Petitioner:
Tabarris Conner
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Mississippi
as 2:2012cv00064
Petitioner:
Cher Tretesse Conner
Respondent:
Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Banks et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Petitioner:
Kendrick Conner
Respondent:
Jacquelyn Banks and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Baggett et al
as 4:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Isham D. Conner
Defendant:
James W. Baggett, B. J. Hall , Carole M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
