Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Lott v. Marshall County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Vicki Teresa Lott
Defendant:
Marshall County, Mississippi , Sheriff Kenny Dickerson and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson et al v. The Service Companies et al
as 3:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Alma Denise Wilson and Lawrence Wilson
Defendant:
The Service Companies, Full Service Systems Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Louding v. DOT Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
Donald Louding
Defendant:
DOT Foods, Inc. , DOT Transportation, Inc. , Fried Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strickland et al v. City of Crenshaw, Mississippi et al
as 3:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Paul Strickland and Brooke Blue
Defendant:
City of Crenshaw, Mississippi , Shawn Shelton , Jason Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Michael Pryor
Defendant:
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lee v. Winston County, MS et al
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
James Lee
Defendant:
Winston County, MS, Jason Pugh, Tim Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
