Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Greene v. Noxubee County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Byron Darius Greene
Defendant:
Noxubee County, Mississippi, The Town of Shuqualak, Mississippi, The City of Brooksville, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Booth et al v. The City of Jackson et al
as 3:2021cv00763
Plaintiff:
ReSheenda Booth and Milton Jackson
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Jackson Police Department, Officer Corry Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Brennan et al
as 3:2019cv00926
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, John Does I-V and Kirby Ragsdale
Plaintiff:
Brandy C. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jenkins v. Sebring et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Defendant:
Shaun Sebring, City of Gulfport, Mississippi, Brantley Cumberland and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougle v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDougle
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, Robert Shuler Smith, Hinds County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Brennan et al
as 3:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brandy C Jenkins
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, Kirby Ragsdale and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spann v. Management and Training Corp, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Keith Spann
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp, Inc. , Lawrence Mack , Lepher Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00874
Plaintiff:
Chakakhan R. Davis
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi , Tyrone Lewis , Jerry Arinder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Beverly A. Clayton
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Jo Robbins, Carol Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
