Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Hedrick v. John Doe
as 5:2021cv00034
Defendant:
John Doe and Timothy Barnes
Plaintiff:
Robert Hedrick
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Doe
as 3:2020cv00616
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Teasia M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dyson v. John Doe
as 3:2020cv00332
Respondent:
John Doe and S. Reiser
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Donald Dyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perilloux v. Doe
as 3:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Warden John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Hulen Perilloux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brunet v. John Doe
as 3:2019cv00879
Plaintiff:
Julio-Armando Brunet, Mandy Brunet and Julio Armando Brunet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Okorafor v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Heanyi Joseph Okorafor
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Shawn R. Gillis, John-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brunet v. Doe
as 3:2019cv00820
Respondent:
John Doe
Petitioner:
Julio Armando Brunet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vurimindi v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
Vamsidhar Vurimindi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Kevin K. McAleen, Unknown John-Doe, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Octavio Bringas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Octavio Bringas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
