Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Chappell v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
City of Biloxi, Mississippi and Unknown Kelly
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boler v. Christopher
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Russell Boler
Defendant:
Kelly Christopher
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Withers
as 3:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamont Kelly
Defendant:
Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mann v. Warden
as 3:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mann
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Kelly
as 1:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
Joseph Samuel Lewis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womack v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Larry Womack
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babb v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robert Babb
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colter v. Kelly et al
as 4:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Herbert Colter
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Robert Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glidden v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv00760
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Glidden
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly and Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Winters
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
