Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Hinds County et al
as 3:2016cv00489
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Hinds County Board of Supervisors and Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hijaz El v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00650
Plaintiff:
Rasul Tahir Hijaz El
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. City of Petal, Mississippi
as 2:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Petal, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Dawn Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dawn Properties, Inc., Southern Cross Construction Company, Inc., Ridgeland Construction One, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. City of Meridian et al
as 4:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Meridian , County of Lauderdale , Frank Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Todd v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv00300
Plaintiff:
B. R. Todd
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
United States of America v. Mercker
as 1:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Theresa O. Mercker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Magee et al
as 3:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcus Manly Magee, III , Ina Magee and M.M. and S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
