Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,464
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Bobbie Adams
Defendant: Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Poplarville, MS
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Bert Martin
Defendant: City of Poplarville, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Reginald Lacey
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Cos O. Denham
Defendant: United States Government and City of Union, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Cos O. Denham
Defendant: United States Government and Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?