Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Carney et al v. Brandon Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv00617
Plaintiff:
David O. Carney and Theresa Nicole Carney
Defendant:
Brandon Police Department , Rankin County School District , Buddy Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tester v. Rankin County et al
as 3:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Shann Tester
Defendant:
Rankin County , Dean Scott , Bryan Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Jefferson County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carl Bailey
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Mississippi , Ray Perryman , Larry McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thomas et al v. Hosemann
as 2:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Thomas, Carl Bibeau, Teresa Bibeau and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bailey v. Madison County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00502
Plaintiff:
Billy Bailey
Defendant:
Madison County, Mississippi, Madison County Sheriff's Department, Toby Trowbridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
