Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 61 - 70 of 85
D. v. Pugh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00043
Defendant: Gerald Wayne Pugh , Kevin Fortinberry , Greene County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff: E. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claiborne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. Claiborne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00029
Plaintiff: Claiborne County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP
Defendant: Claiborne County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors, Claiborne County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Claiborne County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vicksburg, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. Warren County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00028
Plaintiff: Vicksburg, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP
Defendant: Warren County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Warren County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Warren County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Simpson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00123
Plaintiff: Simpson County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and L. J. Camper
Defendant: Simpson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Simpson County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee, Simpson County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams County Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2011cv00030
Plaintiff: Adams County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Jacqueline Marsaw
Defendant: Adams County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Adams County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Adams County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amite County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Amite County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff: Amite County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Glenn Wilson
Defendant: Amite County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors, Amite County, Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, Amite County, Mississippi Republican Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP v. Pike County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00122
Plaintiff: Frank Lee and Pike County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP
Defendant: Pike County, Mississippi Board Of Supervisors , Pike County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee, Pike County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners and others
Intervenor_defendant: Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Madison County Board of Supervisors et al v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2011cv00119
Plaintiff: Madison County Board of Supervisors and John W. Robinson , III
Defendant: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI , Lee Westbrook , Madison County Republican Executive Committee and others
Movant: City of Madison, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Breland v. Forrest County Sheriff Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00303
Plaintiff: Willie Clyde Breland
Defendant: Forrest County Sheriff Department, Forrest County Sheriff Billy Bob McGee, Forrest County Sheriff Deputy Captain Glenn Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?