Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
McDowell v. Reeves
as 3:2021cv00722
Plaintiff: Christopher Maurice McDowell
Defendant: Carlton W. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00998
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gallion v. Hinds County, Mississippi
as 3:2014cv00139
Plaintiff: Maurice Gallion
Defendant: Hinds County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallion v. Hinds County Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00736
Plaintiff: Maurice Gallion
Defendant: Hinds County Mississippi, Tyrone Lewis, Calvin Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00880
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00457
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Washington et al v. Pittman et al
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff: Carlene Thomas Washington and Clifton Lee Thomas
Defendant: Trey Pittman, Ephraim Torres, City Of Lumberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01020
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hinton v. Watson et al
as 3:2007cv00239
Plaintiff: Maurice O. Hinton
Defendant: Officer J. Watson, Jackson Police Department, Sgt. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?