Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Shepard v. U.S. Marshal Service and Task Force
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Harold Shepard
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Chief of Police James E. Davis, Officer Miron B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepard v. US Marshal Service and Task Force
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Harold Shepard
Defendant:
US Marshal Service and Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheriff v. City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Sheriff
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Mississippi, Jackson Police Department, Chief of Police James E. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepard v. U S Postal Inspection Service et al
as 2:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Harold Shepard
Defendant:
U S Postal Inspection Service, U S Marshal Service and Task Force, U S Department of Vet Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. U. S. Marshal
as 3:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. U.S. Marshal
as 3:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Attia v. Forest General Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Forest General Security, Paul Re'Ally, Forest General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Meg Bartlett, State of Mississippi, U. S. Marshals and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Amum'Ra Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
