Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and City of Union, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Denham v. United States Government et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Cos O. Denham
Defendant:
United States Government and Mississippi Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. MS State IRS et al
as 3:2023cv03176
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
MS State IRS and DOJ etc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Joiner v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Latoya Joiner
Defendant:
William King, Arthur James, Jeremy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Talley v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Jackson State University, Eric Stanton, Shivon Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale v. The City, County & State, of Jackson Mississippi
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hudson Hale
Defendant:
The City, County & State, of Jackson Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
