Cases 111 - 120 of 471
Loucks v. Epps
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Nate Lee Loucks
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winding v. Evans et al
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Tyeasa Evans, Keith Ball, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Hughes
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Catchings v. Epps
as 3:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cedric Catchings
Defendant:
Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearron v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Ron King, Brenda Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Colbert et al
as 3:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Kevin Colbert , Lillie Blackmon Sanders , Craig Godbold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Hollie et al
as 4:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
H. Hollie, T. Naylor, M. Powe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., H. Hollie, T. Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00512
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Floyd
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Floyd
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Mississippi, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
