Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Steven Morris
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Threadgill v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Threadgill
Defendant:
Dentist Mr. Williams, Ms. Donaldson, Mrs. Morris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morris and Christopher Jermaine Morris
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Minor v. Turner et al
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Cedric Minor
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, Timothy Morris and Lee Simon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullum v. Turner et al
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Paul McCullum
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Timothy Morris, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 3:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Superintendent Timothy Morris, Warden Johnnie Denmark and Superintendent Earnest Lee
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allred v. Morris
as 3:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bobby Allred
Defendant:
Timothy Morris
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Morris
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Timothy Morris
Plaintiff:
Raymond Keith Thomas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galloway v. Cain et al
as 1:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Timothy Morris and Burl Cain
Plaintiff:
Leslie Galloway, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
