Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Atencio v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00114
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Luis David Moreno Atencio
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez-Rondon v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
Abraham Gonzalez-Rondon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Shawn R. Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gandica Chacon v. Gillis
as 5:2019cv00110
Respondent:
Shawn R. Gillis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Nelson Daniel Gandica Chacon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vurimindi v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
Vamsidhar Vurimindi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Kevin K. McAleen, Unknown John-Doe, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yannezz v. Department of Homeland Security
as 5:2019cv00102
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Shawn R. Gillis
Plaintiff:
Marlon Yannezz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zakharenko v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00095
Defendant:
W. P. Barr, Secretary of DHS, David Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Zakharenko
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Figuereo v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00084
Defendant:
Warden Shawn R. Gillis and Attorney General William P. Barr
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Figuereo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grayer v. Centurion of Mississippi, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00622
Defendant:
Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Gloria Perry, Commissioner Pelicia E. Hall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Grayer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hashim v. Barr
as 5:2019cv00077
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Muhammad Hashim
Defendant:
William Barr
Respondent:
Warden Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wal v. Barr
as 5:2019cv00070
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
William P. Barr and Shawn R. Gillis
Petitioner:
Buay T. Wal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
